Inbreeding may have caused Darwin family ills, study suggests

Inbreeding may have caused Darwin family ills, study suggests
Inbreeding may have caused Darwin family ills, study suggests

Inbreeding may have caused Darwin family ills, study suggests
Date:May 3, 2010


Source: Science Daily via Ohio State University


Summary:
New research suggests that Charles Darwin's family was a living human example of a theory that he developed about plants: that inbreeding could negatively affect the health and number of resulting offspring.


"New research suggests that Charles Darwin's family was a living human example of a theory that he developed about plants: that inbreeding could negatively affect the health and number of resulting offspring.


Darwin was married to his first cousin, Emma Wedgwood. They had 10 children, but three died before age 10, two from infectious diseases. And three of the six surviving children with long-term marriages did not produce any offspring -- a "suspicious" sign, researchers say, that these Darwins could have had reproductive problems because of their lineage.


Studies have shown that susceptibility to infectious disease and unexplained infertility are risk factors of consanguineous marriage -- unions of people related by birth.


Scientists at Ohio State University and in Spain traced the genealogy of the Darwin and Wedgwood families for four generations. Darwin's mother and grandfather also were Wedgwoods, and his mother's parents were third cousins.


The researchers used these data to run calculations in a specialized computer program to determine what is called an "inbreeding coefficient," or the probability that an individual received two identical copies of a gene resulting from marriages among relatives.


The analysis showed a positive association between child mortality and the inbreeding coefficient for Charles Darwin's children and others in the Darwin/Wedgwood families, suggesting that matching damaging genetic traits from the blood-relative parents could have influenced the health of the offspring.


Darwin authored three botanical books showing that cross-fertilization was much more beneficial than self-fertilization for maintaining robust and plentiful plant species. He began to worry about the effects of Darwin-Wedgwood inbreeding on his own family after the death of his daughter, Annie, of tuberculosis at age 10 -- the second of his children to die young.


"He fretted that the ill health of his children might be due to the nature of the marriage, and he came to that because of his work on plants. He realized that with breeding of any kind, it's better to cross-breed than to put close relatives together," said Tim Berra, lead author of the study and professor emeritus of evolution, ecology and organismal biology at Ohio State's Mansfield campus."
http://www.sciencedaily.com/rele.../2010/05/100503111420.htm

 

 

**FAIR USE**

Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.

Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

  • Inbreeding may have caused Darwin family ills, study suggests

Please Support the Research of S8int.com!

Since 2002, Chris Parker has done the majority of the research and writing of articles for s8int.com. If this site has been an encouragement to you, please donate to support Chris's ongoing research. (S8int.com is not incorporated and your donations may not be tax deductable.)

More Posts About Featured

OH NO! ANOTHER MYTH TRUE? “29.000 YR. OLD” SIBERIAN UNICORN DISCOVERED!
Fair Warning!
Crouching Dragon, Hidden Dinosaurs-How Evolutionary Science Hides Historical Man and Dinosaur Interaction in Plain Sight
Tracking the Ancient Griffin, Modern Monsters and the “Extinct” Pterosaur Through Art, History and Science
Dinosaurs at the "Temple"; The Angkor Wat Stegosaur; the Bi-Pedal Dinosaur and Giant Creature at Umm El-Kanatir and Others
Crucifixion Ain’t No Fiction: Three Hour Darkness Over the Entire World Confirmed by Historical Sources
“So God Created the Great Dragons” Genesis 1:21 Yes, the Bible Mentions “Dinosaurs
Pueblo People's Lambeosaurine Dinosaur on Cover of Archaeological Publication?
DNA; The Ultimate Out of Place Artifact!
The Great Worldwide Flood of Noah: Where Did All That Water Come From--And Where did It Go? Oceans Under the Oceans
He Has Done It! Psalm 22
The Unraveling of Scientific Materialism by Phillip E. Johnson
Is the Earth Really at the Center of the Universe? The Cosmic Microwave Background and Numerous Probes Say Yes!
THE ASHLEY PHOSPHATE BEDS. AN EVOLUTIONIST'S WORST NIGHTMARE: Man, Dinosaur, Mammoth and Mammal Bones Together
Grisly find suggests humans inhabited Arctic 45,000 years ago
The Day the Sun Stood Still--Joshua's Long Day
An Essay Concerning Giants, by Dr. Thomas Molyneux M.D., Philosophical Transactions 1700-Taking the Logic out of MythoLOGICal
Your Daily Dinosaur: Moche Culture Man Loses Head to Dinosaur—You Keep Yours—Man and Dinosaurs Co-Existed
Finding Giant Human Bones and Skeletons In the Americas is Old News: Newspaper Articles Concerning Giants Human Relics from the 1800s and 1900s
Aliens Cause Global Warming: A Caltech Lecture by Michael Crichton

Warning: Parameter 2 to googleAnalytics() expected to be a reference, value given in /home1/s8int/public_html/tmp/templates_c/ae8c2ccbf8ab62fdd7d23a4b5e88bd475f81a724_0.cms_template.bfscripts.php on line 85