Un-intelligent Design: No Purpose for Vestigial Ear-Wiggling Reflex

Un-intelligent Design: No Purpose for Vestigial Ear-Wiggling Reflex
Un-intelligent Design: No Purpose for Vestigial Ear-Wiggling Reflex

Un-intelligent Design: No Purpose for Vestigial Ear-Wiggling Reflex
By Stephanie Pappas, Live Science Contributor


"Around the human ear are tiny, weak muscles that once would have let evolutionary ancestors pivot their ears to and fro. Today, the muscles aren't capable of moving much — but their reflex action still exists.


These muscles are vestigial, meaning they're remnants of evolution that once had a purpose but no longer do."


S8intcom: Vestigial is quickly becoming a synonym for ignorance. As in,  "we scientist's don't know what the organ/system does so we will claim its vestigial and try to use it to promote evolutionary theory."


This claim is one of double ignorance though. I personally can move both of my ears- the left one I can wave at you- and of course I know others who can do it as well. (I've got to work the right ear out more)


The article notes that the muscle system is intact--so--what kind of evolution accounts for humans maintaining a functioning small muscle system over "millions of years" although it has "no function"?


Most vestigial organs have gone the way of the flip phone. As we learned better we did better. When we (science) finally figured out what these "vestigial" items actually did -we did better. We left that specific ignorance behind. When someone claims that an organ is vestigial they are merely throwing up their hands and saying "I got nothing".


I can move my ears but to what purpose? Some say it helps move ear wax up to the front of the ear--but to be sure they work as designed.

".....of the 180 or so organs that have been called vestigial in humans, all have been shown to have function. Last, and most importantly, for this type of argument to be used, one has to assume evolution to be true in the first place! So, if vestigial organs are obviously left over from our evolutionary heritage, then evolution must be true. Here evolution is assumed to be true in order to make the argument. This is a logical fallacy, called begging the question." Answers in Genesis

Famous Atheist Richard Dawkins made spectacular negative (toward God) claims about "junk DNA" and the design of the eye which recent events have served to make him look--ignorant.

A wave a disapproving finger and ear at him and his fellow travelers.


http://www.livescience.com/52544-vestigial-ear-muscles...
 

**FAIR USE**

Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.

Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

  • Un-intelligent Design: No Purpose for Vestigial Ear-Wiggling Reflex

Please Support the Research of S8int.com!

Support S8int.com with a PayPal Donation!

Since 2002, Chris Parker has done the majority of the research and writing of articles for s8int.com. If this site has been an encouragement to you, please donate to support Chris's ongoing research. (S8int.com is not incorporated and your donations may not be tax deductable.)

More Posts About Creationism

Extra-Biblical Evidence of the True Existence of Gideon from the Book of Judges Found
Infants prefer toys typed to their gender, says study Science Daily
Dinosaur To Bird Evolution is a Bird-Brained Evolutionary Idea
Pssst! Don't Tell the Creationists, But Scientists Don't Have A Clue How Life Began
Heart Rending Memorial Sculpture of Mother and Aborted Child
Study Published in Nature Says that Vast Majority of Mutational Changes in Human Genome Occurred in the Last 5,000-10,000 Years: Cue Genesis
If It Were Possible, Science’s “Plant Evolution” Story is Dumber than Its Evolution of Species Story; How Our “Unsophisticated” Ancestors Genetically Manipulated Inedible Wild Grasses Over hundreds of Generations- Into Today’s Primary Grains--While they R
Multi-Disciplinary Scientists Look for "Natural" Explanation for Evidence of Conflagration and Destruction on the Ground at Sodom.
Neanderthal Found in Tomb with Chain-mail Armor
Regeneration of the Rib. Did Adam's Rib Grow Back?
Sweeping New DNA Study Perplexes "Darwinists"--Most Animal Species and Man "Emerged" Recently and at the Same Time
A Simple Experiment Which Should Refute Creationism?
Mystery of why humans die around 80 may finally be Solved
Can't An Atheist Woman Have Morals? Or at Least Make Choices?  Selfish Genes vs “Skepchick’s” Jeans
Half-Life of DNA Revealed: The Unscientific Method
Paper Draws Criticism; Peer-reviewed Paper Arguing for the Uncertainty of Radiometric Dating Raises Anti-Creationist Hackles
“Oh What A Tangled Web We Weave, When At First We Practice to Deceive”–Alleged 165 Million Year Old Spider Looks Just Like 165 Day Old Spider
Geologists Discover Water Cuts Through Rock At Surprising Speed
The Top 11 Science Stories of 2011 for Christians/Creationists
THE CREDIT CRUNCH FOR MATERIALISM