- Featured
-
OOPARTS
- Under Water Cities
- Cave Men
- Advanced Ancient Technology
- Cryptids
- Nephilim
- Mega Fauna
-
Creationism
- Noah's Ark
- Bone Yards
- Redemption
- Intelligent Design
- Cosmology
Intelligent Design
A Science-based Defense of Creationism vs. Evolution” by Bruce R. Matson
The inner workings of a cell animation
DNA studies show that much of what science has criticized the Creator for has been disproven in the most recent science. Its been an embarrassment to Atheists and Materialists based on their prior sarcasm.
In a scientific paper, the authors note the Creator's skill and intention in designing human hands. Then all heck broke loose.
A hundred years of fraudulent drawing (Haeckel's drawings were discovered to be faked over 100 years ago but still appear in some biology textbooks) suggesting biological affinities that don't exist.
Duh! Evidence That Macro-Evolution Doesn’t Exist?
The second part of that headline is mine, of course, but put that together with that damning quote by Stephen Jay Gould, (pictured) famous paleontologist about the lack of transitional fossils, it ought to provide reason to question this entire evolution edifice.
Human existence is possible because the constants of physics and the parameters for the universe and for planet Earth lie within certain highly restricted ranges. John Wheeler and others interpret these amazing "coincidences" as proof that human existence somehow determines the design of the universe.
These authors mention design a number of times, apparently quite unselfconsciously. We would have to agree that design rather than random, undirected mutation explains why the brain is so fearfully and wonderfully made....